Cotton Loan Forfeiture Charges/Procedures for ELS Cotton

Based on recent discussions with USDA officials, there are important clarifications on the charges or fees a producer is responsible for when warehouse-stored Pima cotton is forfeited to USDA. In general, the calculations on cotton forfeiture charges are the same for both Pima and upland cotton. If Pima cotton is forfeited to USDA, the producer is only responsible for paying the difference in the Cotton Storage Agreement (CSA) storage rate for the warehouse and the USDA storage credit for the time the cotton is under loan, not the full storage costs for the time the cotton is under loan. For anytime the cotton is not under loan, the producer is responsible for paying the full warehouse storage rate.

More here.

Bangladesh Textile Mills Association Writes ICA Regarding Difficulties to Fulfill Their Contracts

On July 18th, the Bangladesh Textile Mills Association (BTMA) wrote the International Cotton Association (ICA) in regarding to their inability to fulfill contracts due to the current environment. On July 22nd, ICA replied to BTMA by stating “the legal concept of force majeure is intended to cover those circumstances that could delay or impede the full execution of a contract. It does not cancel a contract or remove all obligations for either party.”

Click here for BTMA letter.

Click here for ICA reply.

CFTC’s Open Meeting

On July 22nd, U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission held an open meeting to consider two items: (1) Final Rule: Capital Requirements for Swap Dealers and Major Swap Participants; (2) Proposed Rule: Margin Requirements for Uncleared Swaps for Swap Dealers and Major Swaps Participants. See PDF below for key takeaways and details provided by Delta Strategy Group.

Click here.