New Texas Law Requires Changes to Purchase Contracts

2017 JUL 11 – A NEW TEXAS LAW WILL APPLY TO ALL TEXAS COTTON PURCHASE CONTRACTS WITH PRODUCERS SIGNED ON OR AFTER  SEPT 1, 2017

A copy of HB 338 is attached. We are told this version was adopted by the legislature and signed by the Governor. Despite requests via the Senator from Lubbock and a search on line, the final signed copy is not yet available. However,  we are told this bill was not amended in the Senate or on the floor and that it is the final version of the law. When a signed copy is available we will verify that information.   Please consult your counsel concerning changes to your purchase contracts that will be needed.

Here are the highlights of HB338, and some comments:

HB 338 says that a contract to buy an agricultural product from a producer “must clearly and conspicuously state on its face” whether it is an acreage contract or a quantity contract.

Comment 1:

Comment 2:

  • HB338 does not say what the penalty will be if the contract does not comply, but one can be sure that a producer wishing to sell at a different price than the contract price will assert that a contract which does not comply is unenforceable.

Comment 3:

  •  If your acreage contract contains, as some do, a fixation provision that provides that that when a producer fixes the price he guarantees delivery of the number of bales fixed, we suggest that that such a contract requires special attention in drafting to make the change from an acreage contract to a quantity contract comply with the requirements of HB338.
  • HB338 says that a purchaser may not sue a producer for breach of an acreage contract “unless the producer knowingly fails to deliver all of an agricultural product grown on specified land as provided in the contract.”

Comment 4:

  • We believe the requirement of proof of “knowing” failure to deliver is an invitation to unscrupulous producers to shift the origin of cotton to their advantage, and then, if caught, assert that there was merely a clerical or other mistake. We suggest you and your attorney consider including tightened crop  progress reporting requirements.

 

Attachment

More Advocacy Issues

Delta Strategy Group has provided an update on how regulators and legislative bodies have been working to mitigate some of the impact COVID-19 has on markets, businesses, and households.

Read More
 

We applaud Chairman Wicker for his leadership and responsiveness during the development and finalization of the Federal Maritime Commission’s revised guidance on demurrage and detention.  The final rule, “Docket No. 19-05, Interpretive Rule on Demurrage and Detention under the Shipping Act”, will become effective upon its publication in the Federal Register.  Please see the following […]

Read More
 

December report from Yuan and Associates including 2019 YTD. Read More In December, Madam Gao Fang was promoted to President of China Cotton Association.  Read More We have recently been in contact with by the Cotton Quality Supervision Division of State Administration of Market Regulation (SAMR) of China.  The Cotton Division is a newly established […]

Read More
 

Additional Guidance from USDA on Pakistan Import Requirements: I just left a meeting with the director of USDA/APHIS/PPQ and received some additional guidance.  While there is lots of uncertainty regarding this issue the following is the current position of the USDA:  USDA has received no formal notice of a rule change from Pakistan. USDA has […]

Read More
 

OFFICE OF THE U.S. TRADE REPRESENTATIVE FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Friday, December 13, 2019 United States and China Reach Phase One Trade Agreement The United States and China have reached an historic and enforceable agreement on a Phase One trade deal that requires structural reforms and other changes to China’s economic and trade regime in the […]

Read More
 

Please see the below memo from William H. Allen regarding the USMCA. Read More

Read More